Powered by TypePad
< # CoachBlogs ? >

Support This Site

« Your Wake Up Call | Main | The Power of Approachability »

April 05, 2006

Free Speech is Overrated

Free speech is truly overrated. Just because people have the right to speak and share ideas doesn't necessarily mean that people will say anything meaningful. In fact, as more people have the capability to share their ideas globally, it will pollute the collective consciousness of society.

In his blog, Web Strategy by Jeremiah, Jeremiah Owyang says,

"Enablement software is for the global community, and can empower individuals to enter the global conversation at no cost –just add internet. "

It reminds me of my favorite quote from Jurassic Park, from Dr. Ian Malcom played by Jeff Goldblum,

"I'll tell you the problem with the scientific power that you're using here: it didn't require any discipline to attain it. You read what others had done and you took the next step. You didn't earn the knowledge for yourselves, so you don't take any responsibility for it. You stood on the shoulders of geniuses to accomplish something as fast as you could and before you even knew what you had you patented it and packaged it and slapped it on a plastic lunchbox, and now you're selling it, you want to sell it! "

Now granted Jeremiah is advocating free tools to extend this global conversation, but nothing is truly free. Someone's making a buck somewhere along the way.

You might be asking yourself what this has to do with PDAs. In fact, it has a lot to do with PDAs, because mobility will create more opportunities to broadcast, share and report on life as it happens. It's already happening. And, that will have some drastic consequences. We've already seen the Iranian government harrassing bloggers in that country. My fear is that ever increasing free speech will ultimately result in governments curtailing our rights. Even Singapore has indicated it's going to ban podcasts during the next election.

I guess I'm arguing for measured growth so we can avoid total anarchy. Learn more about Smart Mobs to see how anarchist groups are utilizing technology to swarm public places. Mobile technologies are expected to be used increasingly in upcoming elections. Do you think this behavior might be disruptive? I think so. This trend will only continue. And, what are we to do when terrorists begin using these tools?

Think about it.  Take responsibility for the technology you create and exercise caution. If that doesn't concern you, consider how long it will be before artificial intelligence truly emerges and machines really begin thinking for themselves. But that's a topic for another day.

Bottom line, I'm playing devil's advocate to a certain extent. I don't want to dishonor the U.S. troops who have died in defense of our civil liberties and freedoms. I believe in free speech but we have to exercise caution or else we stand to lose those rights. But, I do think technology advances faster than societies change. See my recent post about the kosher phone for an example of society rejecting technology, or at least constraining the freedoms it offers.

So, be careful of what you create. Let's remember the parable of Frankenstein. Just because you have the technology to create something doesn't necessarily mean it's a good thing! Thank you for your indulgence.

[Member, LinkedIn Bloggers]

Updates:

4-08-06 Jeremiah Owyang posts Global Conversations are Polluting the Collective Consciousness? I Disagree.

4-08-06 Rick Cooper posts Global Conversations Cloud Creative Content

4-08-06 Rick Cooper posts Five Simple Strategies to Muffle Online Pollution

4-08-06 Mike Sansone posts Whistle Stops - 04/08/06

4-09-06 Mike Sansone posts Have Your Say - It's Important to Somebody

4-09-06 Jeremiah Owyang posts Mike the conductor whistles in

April 5, 2006 at 12:55 PM in Future Tech, LinkedIn Bloggers, Moblogging, Web/Tech, Weblogs | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83455448769e200d8345efa6c69e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Free Speech is Overrated:

» A New Dawn? from The Recruiting Animal
Cynics on Blogging I'm waiting to see the hygiene methods that protect authentic blogs from the "zeros, frauds, and bastards" (David Ogilvy). "On blogs, I think the stage is equally set for manipulation, hidden agendas, deception, intimidation, and cra... [Read More]

Tracked on May 5, 2006 6:37:52 AM

» A New Dawn? from The Recruiting Animal
Cynics on Blogging "Just because people have the right to speak and share ideas doesn't necessarily mean that people will say anything meaningful. "In fact, as more people have the capability to share their ideas globally, it will pollute the [Read More]

Tracked on May 5, 2006 7:15:52 AM

Comments

How about a slogan like "Use Technology Responsibly." Would that help?

Posted by: Dennis D. McDonald | Apr 5, 2006 10:57:28 PM

Thanks for the comment Dennis. My rant is over for now. I suppose it does come down to responsibility. We will always keep pushing the boundaries of what's acceptable and possible. It is part of human nature. So, I think our fate is ultimately inevitable.

Posted by: Rick Cooper, The PDA Pro | Apr 5, 2006 11:46:51 PM

"In fact, as more people have the capability to share their ideas globally, it will pollute the collective consciousness of society."

It's hard to imagine that ideas and thoughts could be considered litter. For what it's worth, the ideas and voices that last will be the ones that truely matter. Even if this 'pollution' is published, the true gems will always be found.

Posted by: Jeremiah Owyang | Apr 7, 2006 7:40:26 AM

Thanks for the comment Jeremiah. I think this falls into the category of information overload. The more I surf the internet researching topics and looking for facts, the more I find opinion, conjecture and rhetoric. The explosion of blogs and other online journals has overwhelmed legitimate reporting and journalism. I often find myself thinking, "Why am I reading this?"

It all adds to the mix of information overload which includes email, ezines and spam. I'm afraid all of this serves to reduce productivity; not that productivity is the ultimate state. If anything, people will need to exercise increasing discipline to stay focused and on task and not get sucked into the void that the internet has now become.

I would agree with you that the true gems will emerge and certainly the free availability of sophisticated tools for online publishing will help to facilitate great accomplishments. Let's just hope people will have the patience to find them.

Posted by: Rick Cooper, The PDA Pro | Apr 7, 2006 8:06:28 AM

I hear ya Rick (yes, even through all the noise) I've noticed the following observations.

1 The people that I want to connect with, people that share similar or interesting thoughts, (at this point, you're I put you in this bucket) I end up connecting with and forming a loose network --I see these same people on other areas of the massive internet as I would, and have even formed partnerships with them (check out podcastroundtable.com --we've never met in real life)

2 There are tools to separate the wheat from the chaff, I frequently find my news (from blogs which are conversations) from digg.com and meme sites like http://tech.memeorandum.com/

I had a conversation with Robert Scoble a few weeks ago in Vegas, and we discussed that the truly most aware and smartest people in the world will help deliver conversational news, often they end up on memorandum --we look to that to get the truth

3 Those voices who truly matter to me end up on my feedreader, where I categorize them into different locations.

I guess I just explained how I filter content --I think this may become my next blog post.

Thanks Rick.

Posted by: Jeremiah Owyang | Apr 7, 2006 8:54:43 AM

We all, as human beings, have been given the freedom of thought and choice. Who is to judge while "people have the right to speak and share ideas doesn't necessarily mean that people will say anything meaningful"? Not everyone will be 'interested' in ALL topics let alone what may not be of importance to you may be the treasure of knowledge to someone else. To state that sharing ideas glabally will pollute the collective consciousness of society sounds to me like Hitler has been resurrected.

In today's world we still see barbarism within cultures. Without any form of communications to the individual level on a global basis how can we possibly hope for global unity? I am not saying that we communicate with any lack of resposibility but to deny one of such luxery to say what is on one's mind is to say do not let that person grow and if you leave out the 'not important' parts something can be misinterpretted.

We have seen the world grasp the english language for global business as it covers more words than any other languge to cater to creating business laws since laws help govern fair trade globally. Here is a case where more is better.

Great young minds from middle schools and high schools have shared inventions and projects. Some to go and make millions from an idea. Where did the ideas come from? Freedom of thought and you would be surprised what sparked the idea? Usually a simple whim from someone's ranting of non-importance sparked the idea. A mother complaining about something around the house or a dad barking there must be an easier way to fix something.

As with all things we have to date it is the human that chooses the way they use something. It's the human that kills, not the gun. it's the human that needs information and good information, nuturing information. Information that shows a real human setting, a mother talking about her infant not feeling well. A dad and kids fishing trip at the lake. Brothers and sisters staying in touch as one departs for college. Families sharing their memories from many miles apart and looking for other relatives that seem to have been missed through the years and technology brings them finally together. As we share these kinds of 'non-important' information we are still showing a world that that humanity still lives.

This is leading by example and not by regulations. Regulations continue to tear down family values and social values as well. I'll agree with your next statement of take responsibility, but, take responsibility in sharing the good things of human kind and do it whole-heartedly. Media is a powerful thing. Use it for good. Don't succumb to let others take away by misuse. Those that do not speak and stand up for what is right are part of the problem, not of the solution.

These are my views of the matter and hope that no one takes this as a personal attack to any of this. This is me exercising my rights to freedom of speech.

Kenneth R Sword Jr

http://www.bizzyblogz.com
http://www.bizzyblogz.biz

Posted by: Kenneth R Sword Jr | Apr 8, 2006 2:33:58 PM

Thank you for your thoughtful comments Kenneth. Your words are inspiring and remind us of the wonders of free speech and give us cause to protect those freedoms.

My personal mission is to help sales professionals leverage their time and increase their productivity using their PDA or smartphone. I can assure you that global domination is not on my agenda.

I'm simply concerned over the difficulties in being able to navigate the Internet with the ever growing number of websites, blogs and other online venues. In fact, today, I've offered Five Simple Strategies to Muffle Online Pollution.

I'm sure the technologists out there will offer additional suggestions and help to improve our internet experience as time goes on.

Posted by: Rick Cooper, The PDA Pro | Apr 8, 2006 5:31:29 PM

Rick - You say, "Just because people have the right to speak and share ideas doesn't necessarily mean that people will say anything meaningful." Can we add this: "...yet."

In sales, those just starting are concentrating so hard on their message, they often get their message (and the prospect) confuddled. At some point, they graduate to an assistant buyer and become professional salespeople.

In sharing ideas, those just starting may spew out nothing to some (but something to others). However, with practice - their ideas become sharper.

We don't really know what we know until we articulate it.

Posted by: Mike Sansone | Apr 9, 2006 8:08:08 AM

Thanks Mike. Maybe I'm overstating the problem. I Googled a few common terms expecting an avalanche of blog urls, but that wasn't the case. My concern is not so much over professional blogs, but rather what I would term personal online journals. As Kenneth states in his comment, "As we share these kinds of 'non-important' information we are still showing a world that that humanity still lives."

I'm not arguing to restrict people's ability to communicate online. That capability will continue to grow, as well it should. Further, there should certainly be no requirements on what people can write. I'm, in fact, a strong believer in free speech. I'm not even asking people to write anything meaningful. People can blog their whole lives about nothing at all, in the way that Seinfeld achieved success with a show about nothing at all. I suppose meaning, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder.

I'm just asking the technologists and software developers to continue developing tools and services which offer us greater capabilities to filter the Internet according to our own level of meaning. Perhaps, search engine functionality based on our own algorithms. One that learns what we consider meaning and adapts the internet to our own personal preferences. That's all I'm asking for. Is it too much? Maybe. But, I'm looking 10, 20, 30 years down the line. And, I see a mess on our hands if we don't take action now.

How many of us can truly say our productivity has increased since we began surfing the internet? How many hours have passed by that you wished you had back because you were sucked into the void? It is an individual's personal responsibility to set goals, exercise discipline and hold themselves accountable for their Internet time. But, let's make it easy for people to do that.

Posted by: Rick Cooper, The PDA Pro | Apr 9, 2006 9:18:26 AM

Rick, You're right, pointing this out does go with Dave Taylor's discussion on RSS feeds.

I do think that there's a need/want for better filtering tools. I'm confident they'll come about - partly due to conversations like this one.

I did some Googling of topics that I've written about once or twice and am surprised to see that I'm at or near the top. It proves that search engines love blogs, but maybe a bit too much.

There's no reason I should end up in the top ten of a search on "Gitomer".

Thanks for sharing your signal. Consider me subscribed.

Posted by: Mike Sansone | Apr 9, 2006 10:17:00 AM

I've enjoyed this post and am compelled to semi-quote you on your stand on freedom of speech. you can view my most recent blog for it.

"In fact, as more people have the capability to share their ideas globally, it will pollute the collective consciousness of society."

Posted by: sylvie | Jan 1, 2008 9:02:18 AM

Post a comment